“My conclusion is that there is no reason to believe any of the dogmas of traditional theology and, further, that there is no reason to wish that they were true. Man, in so far as he is not subject to natural forces, is free to work out his own destiny. The responsibility is his, and so is the opportunity.”
The lines are Bertrand Russell’s and I’ve been in mind of them for many days. I suppose that like most people I endeavor in my quietude to affirm the rightness of human consciousness and by this I mean the hopeful, shy, steady properties of optimism. Obviously that’s a steep task, especially if you’re subject to depression as I often am, and certainly the steepness I speak of is tipped all the more by the suffering and dying we witness–have witnessed–know that we will witness. What I know about hope may feel insufficient hourly, but I know my version of the good is borne out by history and not by the ideas about destiny that are peddled by traditional theology.
Not long ago I saw a minister on TV telling his flock that unless they admitted and re-admitted their fallen condition and gave everything they had to Jesus they would be going to Hell. I found myself talking to the screen, saying essentially, “the trees don’t go to hell, the cats and dogs don’t go, the brute whales don’t go, in fact, dear, you’ve reserved only one kind of life for eternal damnation and you’ve done it with sheer inelegance.” That’s what I dislike most about organized religion–it’s sheer inelegance, its lack of grace, and the baldness of the saving narrative. Religion, as defined by the preachers is too ugly for nature and too ugly for god.
I am in mind of this today because I’ve been reading poetry about love. There is more love in poetry and in the privacies of hope than in all the churches. This was always true, but I felt like writing it down.
Bertrand Russell again:
“One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because religion makes men virtuous. So I am told; I have not noticed it.”
Here’s Elizabeth Barrett Browning:
The Face of All the World (Sonnet 7)
by Elizabeth Barrett Browning
The face of all the world is changed, I think,
Since first I heard the footsteps of thy soul
Move still, oh, still, beside me, as they stole
Betwixt me and the dreadful outer brink
Of obvious death, where I, who thought to sink,
Was caught up into love, and taught the whole
Of life in a new rhythm. The cup of dole
God gave for baptism, I am fain to drink,
And praise its sweetness, Sweet, with thee anear.
The names of country, heaven, are changed away
For where thou art or shalt be, there or here;
And this… this lute and song… loved yesterday,
(The singing angels know) are only dear,
Because thy name moves right in what they say.
– Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Planet of the Blind 
Doncha think, SK, glancing about the universe, that love is every bit as corruptable as religion? Imagine, as so often happens, that Ms Browning is a pretentiously empty piece of fluff reciting these lines to some hideously insufferable clod. Religion and love, as well as family, tribes and government, each in its own unique way, seem to exist principally as systems of defining social relationships, with nature being an even broader ecological way that individuals interact with their environments. In these matters, or of wealth and poverty, change and tradition, life and death, the greater notion that we seek in all of these would be the dreadfully nebulous abstraction called goodness, yes?
Perhaps, rather than trying to think that various entities are purely endowed with either goodness or evil, we might do better to assume that all have the potential for both. Then the job of each of us would be to continually try to understand, sort out and influence the good and evil around us in ways that benefit our existence. Why not? Seems plausible.
LikeLike