Staying off the Road

The Finnish poet Pentti Saarikoski wrote in his diary: "I don’t experience my life as a road, a journey from the cradle to the grave, but as an object, a vessel that gradually fills up and, when full, falls apart."

I think it’s good to stay off the road.
It’s good to think of your body as an urn.
Climbing the stairs I imagine I’m carrying water.

**

In disability circles there’s a lot of talk about “gain” as in, being crippled one has advantages where critical thinking is concerned. I like this idea, but not as much as I like the urn. I’m just filling up. It doesn’t matter what I think about this. And it certainly doesn’t matter what road I imagine for myself.

**

“Look at that man! He’s one heavy urn!”

**

An urn walks into a bar. The bartender says “what’ll you have?” Urn says:

Self-Interview # 10

(Readers note: the questioner is a cross between the Id and a river mule…)

Q. Did they always treat you unfairly? And when did you first notice this?

No, not always. I had a full day of happiness in 1959 when I was four years old. I had a stuffed monkey and a wooden top. The top whistled when spinning. As for the monkey, I talked to it. The loss of one’s virginity to unfairness doesn’t happen suddenly. I was a disabled child. Spent a lot of time alone. It dawns on you, even when young, there’s a yin and yang to solitude. As a friend of mine who’s blind says, “sighted people suck.

Q. Did you ever want to stomp on the sighted people?

No. They’re outwitted by the complexities of nature.

Q. What have you learned as a disabled person teaching in universities?

In meetings with faculty and administrators I scrawl signs behind my eyelids.

A Morning Journal About Monsters

If you think you’re the monster that’s alright
If you think you’re alright that’s monstrous
Let’s telephone the monster
“If you want to speak with the monster, press one…”

**
I was raised on moonbeams that came through a small window…

**

“What would an ocean be without a monster lurking in the dark? It would be like sleep without dreams.”

― Werner Herzog

**

Up early rummaging through the medieval stronghold of my skull
But I do it with confidence like a chess master

**

If you think you’re the monster that’s alright
It worked for Nietzsche

**

Sometimes when I call the monster I get Werner Herzog

**

The joke about the freak show is the monsters were at the edge of the fairground thriving on their emptiness

The “freaks” were just birds with damaged wings…
**

Oh come see the monster
Hurry…one slight bruise and he dies…

**

Michel Foucault thought he understood how monsters are made
He imagined they came from architecture and the bourgeois tendency to shuffle papers
He was a child of his age
Monsters need no scripts
They make and remake themselves from slivers of imaginary glass

**

Once while teaching at the University of Iowa I told graduate students that 90 per cent of the imagination is bad for you. I’m revising this to 95 per cent.

Eventually the monster’s tears turn into spectacles…

Jesus Held Up a Coin

Jesus held up a coin
With Tiberius in profile
A profile without love
Power in circulation.

            —Tomas Transtromer

1.

In a smallish fantasy I’ve had for years to think at the moment of my death I’ll be on a far shore, relieved to find my coins are useless. This is not a Greek thing as we all know Charon collected cash. I’ll get over without a dime. So will you. Its good to distrust power in circulation. Love is another matter. Trust and love are sisters. They are as reliable as rain.

I’ve been a disability rights activist for a long time. It has earned me equal measures of positive recognition and a ton of contempt. Able bodied people are not often reliable allies and they’ll turn on a cripple very quickly if she insists on accessibility and justice. But trust and love are sisters and they’re trustworthy.

3.

Trustworthiness is often found wherever power in circulation is absent. This is one part of Jesus’ story—the best part really.

4.

Some years ago I was walking along a street in a medium sized Scandinavian city and found a baby stroller outside a department store. There was a crow sitting in it. He was supremely displayed, wings up, fierce head darting from side to side. Seeing me he flew away. Then the parents came out, strapped their baby into the seat without any idea the dark one had been there. I am, among other things, an amateur philosopher. I thought of Theodor Adorno: “Truth is inseperable from the illusory belief that from the figures of the unreal one day, in spite of all, real deliverance will come.”

5.

Truth is not illusory and Adorno knows it. His sentence depends on a fantasy real as a coconut. Adorno I must leave you. But tomorrow there will be sunlight and it will make the statues gape.

6.

Jesus knew a coin without value when he saw it. This is because he dwelled on the far shore of the minutes.

7.

Someone has to sing so I do
Beside the hole, my father’s grave
& it’s April snowing
Our Savior much like a blue jay
Goes about his business
Talking to no one
Up in a birch.

There’s comfort in the unexpected and seemingly empty places.

The White Horse

D. H. Lawrence, 1885 – 1930

The youth walks up to the white horse, to put its halter on
and the horse looks at him in silence.
They are so silent, they are in another world.

9.

Power is always loud but silence is where the love resides. Take a little time for quietude. (A reminder to the self.)

Perhaps today I’ll listen to a little Parsifal…

10.

Each day now I climb into the sheltering tree that lived outside my boyhood window. I am no longer cold and feel no shame when I’m in its branches. I’m not certain I know much more than the boy knew. Up in the tree “knowing” means my body is a string. That’s what music is of course—sensing your body as one of the strings. Between the notes, true power.

Winter’s Formulae

A longing—one of those poetry words
Like wishful—ice at the windows
And the window glass frosted
And the emptiness that rides us
All coming together as we draw
With a finger on a frozen pane.
Its the season for broken connections
Between memories
Startling again, everything
Turned round, mother
Long dead laughing
As she’s fallen while skiing.
And no one knows how it shall be…
The respite of the dead season…
Hope in nothing…
And the smiling that goes on inside twilight…
I look up as the branches sway…
Gulls eating from the pine cones in snow…

Grief Exercise #1

As Transtromer said, there are bare winter days when the sea and fields are fully known to one another. Now I’m sitting still. What is inside me—the angers of childhood, the lifelong contempt because I’m disabled, they sink now beneath the floor. Far below my house is a moon glow iridescent shelter where human grief huddles as in an air raid. That’s me down there. He’s blind too. He sits under a clock…one of those railroad clocks from the 19th century…it ticks with a language of dead straws…The blind grief boy throws himself forward without trembling; turns around and around; draws dark pictures on the water of solitude. Grief isn’t polite. It’s a stone that migrates up. He draws and the stones appear. He does not know about the world far above where pain might be deleted.

Mindscape 2

Good old Auden, so stinky and sad
In and out of love—
His ghost rushes past
Like a night train

**

The first time they broke my heart—
Well, I won’t tell how
But I promised myself
And man oh man

**

Blind, eyes still ache
Old, still laughing
Frozen tears in my drink
Still don’t know the teacher

**

Poetry?
Makes nothing happen?
Turn to the the walking stones
Tell them

**

I was thinking of you
I guess you’re still alive somewhere
You who read my thoughts
Better than anyone

Ableism, Gaslighitng, and Feeling Good at the Big University

One of the interesting things about ableism is that whatever form it takes it occupies the future perfect. There will be time enough to make things right for the disabled but not today. One may fair say “not today” is the motto of the thing. “Non hodie” in Latin. Picture a flag bearing the image of an indolent house cat. Not today will we question our assumptions about discrimination. BTW: the ableists also avoid saying “maybe tomorrow.”

If you’re disabled and require reasonable accommodations you likely know all about this. At Syracuse U where I work I’ve been agitating, pleading, begging for accessible documents and websites for over a decade. “Non hodie” is the prevailing reply. What’s so demoralizing is that those who ought to be in the fight for disability inclusion are not interested. How can this be? Well, actually, the matter is simple: “there will be time enough to make things right, but not today.” That this “non hodie” includes administrators charged with accessibility and inclusion and also the faculty who teach disability related subjects tells you how big a muscle ableism really is. But there’s another issue…

Fighting disability discrimination makes you unpopular. One may say that fighting for the full inclusion of all historically marginalized folks does so too. But with disability there’s one more turn of the wrench: very few people want to serve as serious allies. There’s almost no up side to being a real disability activist. If you want to be liked, stay away.

It’s not easy in “non hodie” land. One morning, tired, feeling low, I wrote the following draft of a poem:

This morning talking to Stephen’s head…

“You’ve endured so much,
Bullying, lifelong ableism…”

The architectures of wantonness…

Walking alone one sees Raskolnikov’s room…

Confession: having lived in some bitterness,
I fear the cruelties of human indifference
More than
Anything in this world…

**

“Non hodie” harms disabled human beings. It’s not merely that it puts accommodations and full inclusion into a murky future—the disabled who need these accommodations are left hanging, and in order to make this palatable, the ableists employ gaslighting. “You’re asking for accommodations in the wrong tone of voice.” “This isn’t the venue for this.” (As if there was a venue.) It’s the old, “you’re a malcontent, you cripple you” defense. Never do such people say, “wow, we’re violating the law and injuring real human beings.”

Another aspect of the gaslighting business is to have a gaslighting committee—usually it has a name like “Inclusion and Access for One and All” and it meets privately because its all about “non hodie” and self-congratulation. These committees never propose to fix the problems. They have cookies. They talk about inclusion. There’s just one thing. The folks on the committee don’t suffer from a lack of accommodations. In general they feel pretty good.

If you’re like me and you need accessible digital materials to teach and participate in the community and no one wants to fix this in real time—so that you’re “non hodied” half to death—you’re not included in the inclusion and access for one and all club. But you betcha they’ll gaslight you. You’re not fun to be around. And that’s the kicker. In the Neo-liberal university feeling good is the game.

The Syracuse Problem with Accessibility…

When Helen Keller attended Radcliffe she observed that the experience was a “largely lonely triumph” and described how she was ignored by faculty, students, and staff. I’m in mind of this because I’m a blind professor who’s been campaigning for accessibility at Syracuse University for over a decade and I’ve been pretty thoroughly ignored.

I’ve been talking about Syracuse U’s  inaccessible websites, academic digital spaces, unreadable documents, HR inaccessibility, as well as our fickle adherence to the Americans with Disabilities act for twelve full years. After all this time I still can’t get readable documents or visit ADA compliant websites at SU. Let me be clear: I’ve spoken to every conceivable administrator from the very top to the mid-level compliance folks. I’ve called meetings with Deans and faculty. I’ve gotten nowhere. The Office of Diversity, Inclusion, Equity and Access says they have a plan but no one knows what it is. They have a committee on diversity and access but its not public.

There’s a mindset at Syracuse which works like this: “we’ll get to this inconvenient disability stuff in the future.” You should see the number of emails I have that say this when I complain for the umpteenth time about dealing with something I can’t read.

This “tomorrow-ism” doesn’t just affect digital environments. SU recently renovated the JMA Wireless Dome and re-opened the building to paying customers without putting in the required accessible seating. Recently a disabled undergraduate tried to attend a football game and discovered he couldn’t sit with his friends—a matter that’s required by law. When I’ve raised this issue I’ve been told, “we’re working on it”—which means we’ll get to it sometime but not today even though the law says it should be today.

Back to Helen Keller. I often feel as if I’m entirely alone in this advocacy role..I sense what Keller felt. Meanwhile I’ve talked until I’m blue in the face. There’s something at Syracuse, a state of mind, a baked in thing—it says the disabled are welcome to come here but don’t ask for accessibility and certainly don’t expect dignity.

**

Ableism is everywhere but it gets a special pass in higher ed. This is because many believe the apparently broken body has nothing to do with multiculturalism. The disabled are just medical problems.

In fact, when you “talk back” about this you’ll often be labeled as a malcontent. That’s how ableism works. I’ve experienced it multiple times.

Aren’t those cripples supposed to be in iron lungs somewhere out of sight?

Auditoriums everywhere have steps for the visiting reader. No ramps. Bring this up and once again you’re the malcontent.

Most universities like to talk about disability but without the disabled in the room.

Disability and Chance Encounters

In his excellent novel Middlesex Jeffrey Eugenides offers the following resplendent passage:

“Emotions, in my experience, aren’t covered by single words. I don’t believe in "sadness," "joy," or "regret." Maybe the best proof that the language is patriarchal is that it oversimplifies feeling. I’d like to have at my disposal complicated hybrid emotions, Germanic train-car constructions like, say, "the happiness that attends disaster." Or: "the disappointment of sleeping with one’s fantasy." I’d like to show how "intimations of mortality brought on by aging family members" connects with "the hatred of mirrors that begins in middle age." I’d like to have a word for "the sadness inspired by failing restaurants" as well as for "the excitement of getting a room with a minibar." I’ve never had the right words to describe my life, and now that I’ve entered my story, I need them more than ever. ”

There’s a hint of Mark Twain here—Twain who once said: “…mastery of the art and spirit of the Germanic language enables a man to travel all day in one sentence without changing cars.”
But emotion, which is necessarily complex should absolutely require hybrid expression. Any true account of feeling must be composed of elaboration. Disabled people know this and live it. “The disappointment of finding an auditorium is inaccessible, when the talk for the evening is about human rights.” “The misery of being asked by concert security to leave the theater because your wheelchair is blocking the aisle.” “The humiliation of being told we just filled that job when just this morning you were encouraged to come in for an interview and now they see you’re blind.” Compared to these, Eugenides hybrids are tame, even quaint.

Disability is both corporeal in-pleasure and un-pleasure, which is to say embodiment is diverse and dynamic, refined, lovely in the mind itself, and yet, whatever is not enabled becomes transitive and dislocating. There’s a simultaneity to ableist narrations of un-belonging and my crippled friends know the phenomenon quite well. Hybrid ableism reduces one’s affect, bleaches the mind, and it’s a tedious. "The loss that occurs when you’re told your protests for inclusion are tiresome to the normals."

**

Sometimes, like a tightrope walker who sees what he’s actually doing I think about being disabled. Blind, walking ordinary streets with a cane or dog I’m a spectacle. I mean this: disabled folks are mirrors in which the non-disabled observe their private, imagined selves. You know the phrase: “there but for the grace of God go I.” There are days when I say: “to Hell with going out.” Being stared at 24-7 is a drag. And it takes energy to ignore the stares. Yes. I know what you’re doing. I really do. News flash: the blind know when they’re being looked at.

Starting with the industrial revolution people had just enough disposable income to sit around and stare at each other at least one afternoon a week. As everyone who hails from a historically marginalized position knows, there’s a taxonomy to staring. The Victorians knew who and what went where and as cities became increasingly crowded the disabled were not much fun to look at. Worse, in a machine age they weren’t employable. Gone were the old cottage industries—sewing for the blind, blacksmithing for the deaf. Asylums were just the thing—out of sight, out of mind.

Back in 1990 when the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law I told one of my disabled friends: “What until they get a load of us!" The signature aspect of civil rights laws is increased visibility. For the first time in one hundred and fifty years the temporarily abled would have to look at the paralyzed, the blind, people who breathe through tubes, who flap to talk.

And then there are the complex emotions. A woman approaches me on East 61st St. in Manhattan. “My dog died,” she says. “Oh dear,” I say. I know about this. I do. She’s attracted by my guide dog and a switch has tripped in her grief gizmo and all she can think about is her loss. If I was walking with a white cane she wouldn’t have said a thing. “My poor dog died,” she says again, as if saying it once wasn’t sufficient to convey the awfulness of the story. And I’m frozen on the sidewalk. This isn’t the first time. For years strangers have invaded my happy thought bubble to share their dog death stories.

She starts to cry, this stranger, and she reaches out. “Can I touch your dog?” she asks, half weeping, half speaking. The process has taken just a few seconds. I’m reminded that four seconds can be immense. Satan fell from Heaven to Hell in just that time. I understand we’re having an unplanned and wholly unscripted spiritual moment. I can’t allow myself to freeze. A decision must be made. If you have a guide dog you’re not supposed to let strangers touch her (or even friends for that matter.) A working dog is doing just that. It’s not looking for love in all the wrong places. When you’re at home, voila, the harness comes off, and love is all the rage. But not on the sidewalk, not at a street crossing. You’re a team, the two of you, a survival unit. That’s just the way it is. “Yes,” I say, “you can touch my dog.”

And this woman, this strange weeping woman, drops to her knees, pushes her tear streaked face into my Labrador’s face, my surprised dog, and she actually moans.

There are so many corners to grief. So many lofty defeats inside each of us. So many exhaustions, facts, deserts, infinities, unexplored planets.

The non-existence of a dog has incited a vast, soft, exploration here, beside a row of parked delivery trucks outside the Hotel Pierre on a windy autumn day with dead leaves flying in circles like butterflies returned from the after life and she’s weeping into my dog’s thick fur.

“I’m sorry,” I say, “but we have to go now.” And I back up. Corky looks at me, as if to assess how far the grief has traveled. I think she wants to know if I’m OK.

I tell her to go forward. We move away. We enter the silent invasion of the future.

I think of her often, this woman, who loved her dog, who is drowning in the stone pool of her loss.

I think of the dismal routine of New York City or any city.

I think of the unselfish nature of chance encounters.